Wanted - tato sekce je určená pro zmapování a dopátrání lidí, kteří na Rockstárech prostě chybí. Pokud v profilech lezců nenajdete člověka, o kterém si myslíte, že by na stránkách neměl chybět neváhejte ho připsat do seznamu Wanted. Ke každému lezci v seznamu můžete dopsat i poznámku, která pomůže k jeho lapení a zapsání na RS. Poznámku může napsat kdokoliv! Tedy nejen ten kdo jméno hledaného zadá. Pokuste se sami lezce z W-listu oslovit a na založení profilu na RS je upozornit... - tento symbol označuje, že u daného lezce je poznámka. K - tento symbol označuje, že na daného lezce má již admin kontaktPokud znáte osobně některého lezce ze seznamu nebo na něj máte kontakt (nejlépe e-mail) prosíme napište nám
POZNÁMKY 09.10.2015 17:39:07 Dear Igor,I am a fan of Outpost Firewall Pro and a pretty good coeutpmr user (I mean that I am not a professional like you guys!).I tested many different antimalware suites like Norton Internet Security, Panda Platinium, GData and Bitdefender. I can tell you, according to my personal experience, that none of them is perfect with antivirus, antispyware and firewall modules. This is why and also following the good advices of PC Expert magasine (Ziff Davis), I chose a dedicated firewall (Outpost Firewall Pro) and a dedicated antivirus (Eset Nod32) because it seemed at that time that antimalware companies were the best as soon as they were only focusing on their main product. As an example, we even saw Eset Nod32 selling in France its antivirus bundled with your Outpost Firewall Pro which made me very confident with the choice I made a few months before.By the way, why did not you choose Nod32 instead of VirusBuster?Also, when I started using Outpost Firewall Pro, there was no antispyware included, I was using the combination of Ad-Aware and Spyboat Search and Destroy which was fine. Today I am still using them in addition of the Outpost Firewall antispyware function. Why? Because none of these three solutions are good enough to be used alone. So you can understand why I can be doubting about an all-in-one solution eventhough it will suite most of comptuter users.You may say that I am pretty much critical (maybe because I am french!) but I wish you to succeed and to prove that your suite will be better than the ones of your competitors.Best regards,Frederic http://ocdvsokura.com [url=http://tfppqgreg.com]tfppqgreg[/url] [link=http://nypgcn.com]nypgcn[/link] 09.10.2015 09:22:13 Outpost Free doesn't require scipifec updates, so there's no problem with this product. Once we release a new version of Outpost Free, we'll inform our users of an available software update.Pavel GoryakinAgnitum 09.10.2015 03:16:24 A very nice whitepaper folks.Can you plaese discuss one item about scanning files for malware or tell me if I'm mistaken?As documented by VB, in the Pro manual page 67, their engine has the capability of signature scanning a whole file which includes locations where malware doesn't normally reside. They call it an Full scan as opposed to their other two scans - Extensive or Quick.As I understand it, the Agnitum suite does an Extensive scan, according to the VB terminology, where it only looks at those parts of a file where malware is likely to exist and not the rest of the file.Can you explain why the suite doesn't have the capability to fully scan files? http://nvhwdrbmg.com [url=http://bxgnaneoy.com]bxgnaneoy[/url] [link=http://ototczyta.com]ototczyta[/link] 08.10.2015 21:24:07 Fantastic news regarding the fnerzieg issues.I really hope that especially the one related to applications trying to terminate the process NTOSKRNL.EXE is among the ones now gone for the good.Installing the new version and crossing my fingers...Keep up the outstanding work guys :D 26.09.2015 17:39:59 Thank you for responding. What I foorgt to add was that Outpost 2009 lacks the ability to control more narrowly as to either allow a program to load drivers - or not at all. I have not yet tested the 7.0 beta but will once the most critical stability issues have been sorted out. Does 7.0 have the ability to allow a program to load driver A but denying driver B? I understand that, once any driver has been loaded it basically is one the same level as Outpost but if it is not the driver we allowed the program to load then Outpost should be able to distinguish.